“In my experience, those tenants that have fur babies generally stay longer in rentals and look after them well.”
– Serena Page, Property Manager, Christchurch
Posted in dog quotes, Dogs
Tagged cats, dogs, property management, renting with pets, Serena Page
Stress.
People experience it and so do our dogs. Trigger stacking is something I discuss with many of clients.
Trigger stacking occurs when multiple stressors (triggers) accumulate. The stress hormone cortisol builds up and after a time the dog’s natural coping threshold is exceeded. Sudden fear, panic or pain reactions can result – such as when a dog snaps at a member of the family out of character.
Trigger stacking can also occur in people; something I’ve recently experienced on my trip to the USA. So I thought I would put the concept of trigger stacking into perspective using my human experience.
I’d like to start by saying that I am an experienced traveler and typically handle the stress of travel with no issues. This year has been different.
In the days prior to my departure, the US decided to wage war on Iran. Fuel uncertainties seemed to be the only topic in the news and at the time I didn’t honestly know if World War III would break out before I managed to get home. Or, fuel shortages would mean that I couldn’t get back.
So my stressors were already high before a number of things got added:
And this is where my trigger stacking finally reveals itself. I am short-tempered with my sister, still worried about getting home (possibly irrationally so, but I can’t switch it off) and not sleeping. New Orleans creole cooking doesn’t agree with me at our first meal together and I spend the rest of the evening chewing antacids and visiting the toilet. My poor sister is recovering from a cold and coughs sporadically during the night. I am wide awake, reading and checking emails at 2 am. Another night of about 4 hours of sleep and I’m annoyed when my sister wakes me up moving around in our room in the morning. I feel guilty; it is her holiday, too.
Things start to improve; we stick to more ‘normal’ food where possible and make a point of eating fruit and vege at the dinner buffet at our hotel. We seek out a restaurant that serves fish to avoid heavy, fat-laden meals. And we enjoy each other’s company. Still short-tempered, but not quite as pronounced as earlier in the trip.
I decide to ask my travel agent to change my outgoing flight to earlier because the weather prediction is for thunderstorms later in the day. The benefit is that my sister and I are now leaving around the same time and so can travel to the airport together and hang out since New Orleans has a single, connected terminal for all airlines. We have a simple lunch. The new flight time also ensures that I arrive in Houston in plenty of time to make my connecting Air New Zealand flight which greatly reduces my stress.
And my Houston flight to New Zealand is genuinely Air New Zealand, so things are looking up. I sleep most of the trip to Auckland and enjoy a very nice on-board dinner and breakfast, too. (With real fruit and vege).
I’ve been home for a number of days now. I’m sleeping in my own bed, eating my own food, and Sox and I are enjoying our twice-daily outings.
Although the Iran War is still the top news story and I’m worried about what this is going to do to our economy both in the short and long terms, I am home. My USA-induced trigger stack is largely gone and I am back to my normal self.
Trigger stacking increases reactivity in both people and dogs. The inability to settle and irritability are symptoms. In dogs and people, shutting down is often at the extreme end when the nervous system can no longer deal with the stress – luckily I didn’t get to that stage.
We must identify and reduce triggers, managing the environment for better results. I knew how I was feeling, switching hotel rooms and flights were environmental management options for me, as was managing my food choices.
The same holds true for our dogs. It’s just that they have little ability to make changes – it is up to us as their guardians to do it for them.
I hope this post has helped to explain trigger stacking in a somewhat humorous way (it’s a lot more funny now that I am back to normal). Best wishes to all as we navigate a world that has changed over the last eight weeks; may things improve for all in the days to come.
Kathleen Crisley is Fear-Free certified dog massage therapist and canine fitness trainer. She has a particular passion for working with dogs and their families to ensure injury prevention and quality of life. She specialises in working with anxious and emotionally damaged dogs. Her mobile practice, The Balanced Dog, is based in Christchurch, New Zealand
Tagged airlines, management, stress, travel, trigger stacking
An at-home study is tracking how nutrition may influence canine health and the owner-pet relationship over 10 months.
Iowa State University and Freshpet are conducting an at-home research study examining how diet type may affect both dog health and the human–animal bond.
The study, led by Logan Kilburn, assistant professor in animal science at Iowa State, recruited 39 dogs of varying ages and breeds from central Iowa.
“This collaboration allows us to evaluate canine health and the human–animal bond in a setting that is natural and familiar to both dogs and their owners,” Kilburn said. “At-home studies provide valuable insight into how nutrition fits into everyday life and how it may shape the relationship people have with their pets.”
According to the university, participating dog owners will follow assigned feeding protocols over a 10-month period, collecting non-invasive health-related samples and completing surveys designed to assess aspects of the human-animal bond. The study will integrate owner-reported outcomes with objective measures of canine health, providing a comprehensive look at how diet may affect both physical well-being and the owner-pet relationship.
“At Freshpet, we believe nutrition plays a meaningful role in pets’ lives and the relationships they share with their families,” said Gerardo Perez-Camargo, veterinarian and senior vice president of research and development at Freshpet. “Partnering with Iowa State University will allow us to contribute to research that advances the understanding of canine health and the human–animal bond.”
Source: Petfoodindustry.com
Posted in dog nutrition and labelling, Dogs, research
Tagged diets, Freshpet, human animal bond, Iowa State University, relationships
…because the habit of narrating your inner life to a creature who can’t judge you turns out to be surprisingly good practice for the kind of honesty that actual relationships require
Talking to your pets like people isn’t just cute, it’s quietly training you to be more honest and emotionally available in your human relationships too
I’ll admit something that might sound ridiculous. Yesterday morning, while making my oat milk latte, I caught myself explaining to my neighbor’s cat why I was running late. Not in that quick, throwaway “hey buddy” kind of way. I mean a full, detailed account of how my alarm didn’t go off, how I’d stayed up too late reading about cognitive biases, and how the whole morning had spiraled from there.
The cat blinked at me. Slowly. Twice.
And somehow, that felt like enough.
If you’ve ever narrated your grocery list to a dog or debriefed your workday to a parrot, you already know what I’m talking about. There’s something about talking to an animal that feels different from talking to a person. Safer, maybe. Less performative. And as it turns out, that feeling isn’t just in your head. Research suggests that people who regularly talk to their pets like they’re human tend to develop communication habits that actually make them better at connecting with other humans too.
Here’s why that matters more than you think.
Psychologists have a word for what we do when we chat with our pets as though they understand every syllable. It’s called anthropomorphism, and it’s the tendency to attribute human characteristics, emotions, and mental states to non-human entities. Your dog isn’t actually judging your outfit. Your cat doesn’t really have opinions about your ex. But your brain treats them as if they do.
Nicholas Epley, a behavioral scientist at the University of Chicago and one of the leading researchers on anthropomorphism, has argued that this tendency isn’t a sign of immaturity or delusion. It’s actually a byproduct of the same cognitive machinery that makes us good at reading other people. The same mental tools we use to infer what a friend is thinking or what a colleague really meant by that email are the tools we activate when we imagine our dog is sulking because we left for work.
In other words, talking to your pet isn’t a weird quirk. It’s your social brain doing reps.
Here’s what I find most interesting about this whole thing, and I’ve mentioned this before but it keeps proving true: the environments where we practice being honest matter just as much as the honesty itself.
Think about the last time you wanted to say something vulnerable to someone you care about. Maybe you needed to admit you were struggling, or that something they did hurt you, or that you didn’t have it all figured out. Chances are, you rehearsed it. In the shower. In the car. In your head while pretending to listen to a podcast.
Talking to a pet is a version of that rehearsal, except it happens out loud. And out loud matters.
When you tell your dog about your terrible day, you’re not just venting into the void. You’re practicing the act of putting internal experience into words. You’re narrating feelings that might otherwise stay tangled up in your chest. And you’re doing it in front of a living creature who won’t interrupt, won’t argue, and won’t make you feel stupid for saying it.
According to Psychology Today, people who anthropomorphize tend to show stronger social bonds and richer empathy. The habit of imagining an inner world for another being, even an animal, exercises the same perspective-taking muscles we rely on in human relationships.
Your cat can’t validate you. Your dog can’t offer advice. Your goldfish isn’t going to text you back with a thoughtful response at 2 a.m.
And that’s precisely what makes these conversations so useful.
When I lived through my aggressive vegan phase years ago, I learned something painful about communication. I spent three years armed with statistics and moral arguments, convinced that if I just said the right thing in the right way, people would change. My friend Sarah’s birthday dinner became a lecture. Family gatherings turned into debates. I was so focused on being right that I forgot how to actually connect with anyone.
What finally broke the pattern wasn’t a better argument. It was learning to talk without needing a specific response. Learning to say things honestly, without controlling the outcome.
That’s what talking to a pet teaches you. You learn to express yourself for the sake of expression, not for the sake of winning. There’s no scoreboard. No defense mechanism on the other end. Just you, saying what’s true, and a creature who receives it without judgment.
Research on self-disclosure consistently shows that the act of sharing personal information, even when the listener can’t fully understand it, builds our capacity for vulnerability. It trains us to tolerate the discomfort of being seen. And that tolerance is one of the most important ingredients in any meaningful relationship.
It’s not just a psychological phenomenon either. There’s a biological layer to this that I find genuinely fascinating.
A comprehensive review published in Frontiers in Psychology examined dozens of studies on human-animal interaction and found that positive contact with pets is linked to the release of oxytocin, the same hormone involved in bonding between parents and children, and between romantic partners. The review also found evidence that these interactions can reduce cortisol levels, lower blood pressure, and even increase trust toward other people.
So when you’re sitting on the couch telling your dog about your annoying coworker, your body is doing more than just relaxing. It’s chemically priming you for better human connection. The oxytocin system doesn’t distinguish between species when it comes to bonding. A warm, safe interaction is a warm, safe interaction, whether it’s with your partner or your Labrador.
This is something I think about a lot during my photography walks around Venice Beach. You’ll see dozens of people on any given morning having full-blown conversations with their dogs. Asking them questions. Narrating the scenery. Explaining why they chose to walk left instead of right. From the outside, it looks eccentric. From the inside, it’s probably the most emotionally honest those people will be all day.
The real payoff of this habit isn’t in the conversations you have with your pet. It’s in how those conversations change the ones you have with people.
I’ve been with my partner for five years now. We have very different lifestyles in a lot of ways, including what we eat and how we think about food. Early on, I could have easily fallen into old patterns of trying to convince and convert. Instead, I’d learned (the hard way, through years of burned bridges) that real communication isn’t about persuasion. It’s about honesty without agenda.
And honestly? I think some of that skill got sharpened in the smallest, most ridiculous moments. Explaining my feelings to a stray cat on my balcony. Talking through a tough decision while a friend’s dog stared at me from across the room. Those moments taught me to hear my own voice saying difficult things without flinching.
As Psych Central notes, anthropomorphism may help people better understand others and connect with the world around them. The same mental habit that lets you imagine your pet has feelings also sharpens your ability to consider what the humans in your life might be going through.
If you’ve ever had a partner tell you that you’re a good listener, or a friend say they feel safe talking to you, part of that might trace back to the hundreds of tiny, unwitnessed conversations you’ve had with animals who couldn’t talk back. You were building a muscle you didn’t even know you were training.
It’s tempting to file “talks to pets” under the same category as “collects too many houseplants” or “names their car.” Harmless. Cute. A little weird.
But the research suggests it’s more than that.
People who regularly engage in anthropomorphic behavior tend to score higher in empathy. They’re more likely to consider perspectives beyond their own. They show patterns of emotional regulation, using a calm, gentle tone with their pet, that carry over into stressful human interactions. They practice repair quickly, softening after a raised voice, returning to warmth without being asked.
My grandmother, who raised four kids on a teacher’s salary and still volunteers at the food bank every Saturday, has always talked to animals like they’re old friends. I used to think it was just her personality. Now I think it might be part of why she’s one of the most emotionally intelligent people I know. She never needed a psychology textbook to understand that practicing kindness in small, invisible moments makes you better at kindness in the moments that count.
If you talk to your pets like they’re people, you’re not being silly. You’re rehearsing honesty in a space where it costs you nothing, and building emotional skills that pay off everywhere else.
The habit of narrating your inner life, out loud, to a creature who can’t judge you, turns out to be surprisingly good training for the kind of vulnerability that actual relationships require. It lowers your defenses. It teaches you to express without performing. And it keeps your empathy muscles in shape for when the stakes are real.
So the next time someone catches you explaining your day to a cat, don’t apologize.
You’re just practicing being human.
Source: Jordan Cooper, Veg Out
Posted in dog ownership, Dogs, research
Tagged communication, life, love, mental-health, oxytocin, pets, relationships, talking, talking to pets, writing
NZ-owned pet company Pet Direct released its pet survey recently and this infographic was the one I found most interesting and relevant.
The results align well with what my clients tell me. They seek out my services for support in their dog’s care – so of course general health features.
Arthritis is a major concern (no one likes to see there dog growing old) and there is a lot of confusion about what management options are available and that arthritis is actually a disease of the young dog. I still see too many pet parents who think a supplement is going to be their 100% solution which is the farthest from the truth. A multi-modal management strategy is needed.
And then comes anxiety. Thanks to my Fear Free certification, a lot of the clients I see have dogs with multiple issues and one of those is anxiety. Imagine living your life in a constant state of stress, unable to communicate in people language what is wrong! I really feel for these dogs. Massage, acupressure and lifestyle changes are all part of the picture for these dogs.
A friend of mine said she noticed that many of the posts on my Facebook page mention weight loss. Weight adds stress to the joints – so no surprises that weight management and diet are on my assessment list, too.
It’s certainly worth looking at the Pet Direct survey and thinking of what you can do for your dog and how you fit within the ‘norms’ of pet ownership in NZ. My full assessments include a review of your dog’s veterinary history, an in-home visit with gait analysis, massage and exercise game plan recommendations. Easy, convenient and cost effective.
Kathleen Crisley is Fear-Free certified dog massage therapist and canine fitness trainer. She has a particular passion for working with dogs and their families to ensure injury prevention and quality of life. She specialises in working with anxious and emotionally damaged dogs. Her mobile practice, The Balanced Dog, is based in Christchurch, New Zealand
Tagged animals, arthritis, canine arthritis, diets, Dog, dog massage, dogs, health, health concerns, Pet Direct, pets, supplements, survey, weight management
Sir Brian Harold May is the lead guitarist for the band Queen and is an animal welfare activist and astrophysicist.
Posted in dog quotes, Dogs
Tagged animal activist, animal welfare, astrophysicist, Brian May, guitarist, queen, Sir Brian May
Dogs influence the air quality in homes. A study from Lausanne has measured for the first time the gases, particles and microbes that four-legged friends bring indoors.
The researchers see the results as a basis for more realistic models of indoor air, the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) said on Monday, 23 February 2026. The influence of humans on the air has been well researched. However, the researchers say that the impact of pets has hardly been considered to date.
According to the study, a large dog at rest emits about the same amount of CO2 as an adult human. The amount of ammonia emitted is also comparable. This gas is produced when proteins are broken down and is released via the skin and the air we breathe.
According to the data, however, dogs had the greatest influence on particles in the air. By shaking, scratching or stroking, they stir up large quantities of dust, pollen, plant residues and microbes. Large dogs release two to four times more microorganisms than a human in the same room.
The animals act as mobile “carriers”, transporting biological material from the outside to the inside and distributing it throughout the room through their activities. However, this increased variety of particles in the interior is not necessarily negative, according to the researchers. Some studies suggest that contact with various microbes can promote the development of the immune system, especially in children.
Another aspect concerns chemical reactions indoors. Ozone that enters homes from outside reacts with skin lipids and forms new substances such as aldehydes or ketones. In humans, squalene, a component of skin sebum, plays a role here.
Dogs do not produce squalene themselves. However, humans transfer skin residues to the animals’ fur when stroking them. These residues then also react with ozone. On average, however, dogs produced around 40% less ozone reaction products than humans.
The team used a controlled environmental chamber at the EPFL in Fribourg for the measurements. Two groups of dogs were analysed: one with three large dogs (a Mastiff, a Tibetan Mastiff and a Newfoundland) and one with four small dogs (Chihuahuas). The study was published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
Source: Swissinfo.ch
Tagged allergies, child development, dogs, health, indoor air quality, microbes, science
Four years ago, there were heartbreaking photos of Ukrainians fleeing their country, some with their dogs on leash, in prams, and in backpacks. Many dogs were not so lucky.
Now, there is new research to show how the dog population has changed in just those four short years. A kind of natural selection, expedited by the impacts of living in a war zone. Small dogs survive because they are less likely to trigger land mines, there’s less body mass to be impacted by shrapnel and they are more able to hide in confined spaces. Troops and researchers alike report the impacts of ongoing fear, anxiety and stress in the dogs – the trauma of living in a war zone when once they were a loved pet.
Below I share this New York Times piece in its entirety to spread the word that wars are environmental disasters which are entirely man made…
The human cost of the war in Ukraine has been well documented. But Russia’s invasion is also affecting the country’s pets in surprising ways.
In a study published in December 2025, in the journal Evolutionary Applications, a group of researchers found that exposure to the conflict in Ukraine had, in a short period, transformed dogs that were formerly pets into the kind of dogs found in more wild environments.
Scientists gathered a variety of data from 763 dogs across nine regions of Ukraine. The team worked with animal shelters, while veterinarians and volunteers gathered data from stray dogs in potentially safe areas and, sometimes, areas designated as dangerous territories.
But gathering data on the front line was more difficult. That work was led by Ihor Dykyy, a zoologist at the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. Dr. Dykyy served on the front line — near the city of Lyman in the Donetsk region, and later close to Kharkhiv near the border with Russia — for two years starting in 2022 as a volunteer with the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
“Many stray dogs lived with us in the village of Zarichne,” Dr. Dykyy remembered. “They were terrified by the hostilities; some suffered from shell shock. One small dog had a broken leg that hadn’t healed properly, leaving it with a permanent limp. Another was blind in one eye, having lost it in an explosion.”
Dr. Dykyy and his fellow soldiers “fed all of them, gave them shelter and provided medical care whenever possible,” he said.
Although the research focused on domestic dogs, many were no longer under the care of their owners, and were living as strays.
“From the beginning of the war, we saw a very sad situation with pets in Ukraine,” said Mariia Martsiv, who was the paper’s lead author and is a zoologist at the University of Lviv. “Some people took their pets with them, but some were simply left at train stations or left behind in the occupied territories.”
Most of the team’s findings suggested that dogs on the front line, in a remarkably short period of time, had become more like wild dog species, such as wolves, coyotes or dingoes.
Examples of the transformation abounded in the data: The frontline dogs rarely had snouts that were either short like a French bulldog’s or elongated like a dachshund’s. Many also had reduced body mass. Even their ears took on a different shape, with pointed ears more frequent than floppy ears.
“On the front lines, dogs with signs of a ‘wild’ phenotype do indeed survive more often: straight ears, straight tail, less white,” Dr. Martsiv wrote in an email.
“War acts as a powerful filter, favoring traits that improve survival under extreme conditions,” said Małgorzata Witek, an author of the study and a doctoral student at the University of Gdansk in Poland.
Other characteristics more commonly associated with wild dog species were found in Ukraine’s conflict zones: There were fewer old, ill and injured dogs, and dogs on the front line were more likely to be found living in groups.
“What surprised us most was how quickly these changes appeared,” Ms. Witek said. “The war had been ongoing for a relatively short time, yet the differences between frontline dogs and other populations were already very pronounced.”
But the scientists did not want their findings interpreted as war-fueled accelerated evolution.
“The changes we observe in dogs are happening too quickly to be explained by molecular evolution,” Ms. Witek said.
What’s really happening is that the conditions of war favor animals that have certain characteristics. For example, a dog with less body mass is less likely to trigger land mines and more able to hide in confined spaces, and presents a smaller target for shrapnel.
Despite evidence of apparently wild personality traits and physical characteristics, most of the dogs remained dependent on humans for food, only supplementing their diet with plants and occasional hunting. At times, dogs survived by scavenging the bodies of fallen soldiers. Some were adopted by Ukrainian troops.
But the scientists did observe some dogs on the front line that no longer depended on people for their survival.
“This can be considered as feralization, a return to living independent of humans,” said Małgorzata Pilot, leader of the project and a biologist at the University of Gdansk.
While the study was restricted to dogs, it raises questions about the broader implications of environmental damage caused by war.
“Evidence that dogs are being strongly negatively affected by the horrors of war should serve as an alarm for other species that are far less mobile and more restricted in their diets and habitat requirements,” said Euan Ritchie, a wildlife ecologist at Deakin University in Australia who was not involved in the project.
Or as Dr. Pilot put it, “Wars are not only humanitarian crises. They are also environmental disasters.”
Source: Anthony Ham, New York Times
Posted in animal welfare, Dogs, research
Tagged Evolutionary Applications, invasion, natural selection, New York times, news, survival, trauma, Ukraine War
“I am, as they say, a dog person.”
– Yves Saint Laurent, fashion designer
DoggyMom.com 